It is not outright evident what was said, but the event brings to mind some important questions. Regarding the same event, another individual wrote that the nun deviated “into realms of sociology and anthropology,” which are “beyond the scope of her expertise” ( Galbraith 2014). Shortly before this paper was written, a Catholic nun was accused of “using suspect anecdotes, antiquated data, and broad generalizations to demonize gays and lesbians” ( Funk 2014). This article suggests that instead of supporting their claim with scientific evidence, those major medical associations arbitrarily label homosexuality as normal. Those medical associations have proposed that their homosexuality-is-normal claim is based on “scientific evidence.” This article critically reviews that “scientific evidence” and finds that much of their literature does not support the claim that homosexuality is normal. have labeled homosexuality as a normal counterpart of heterosexuality. Since the 1970s, however, major medical associations in the U.S. Lay summary: At one time, homosexuality was considered to be mentally disordered. As a result of their deficiencies and arbitrariness, the credibility those two groups that are typically deemed authoritative and trustworthy is called into question. This paper summarizes and analyzes that purported scientific evidence and explains that much (if not all) of the evidence is irrelevant and does not support the homosexuality-is-not-a-mental-disorder claim. The American Psychiatric Association and the American Psychological Association have suggested for many years now that there is significant empirical evidence supporting the claim that homosexuality is a normal variant of human sexual orientation as opposed to a mental disorder.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |